With summer’s end approaching we are heading into an intense political
season, with much hanging in the balance. The U.S. presidential election will
have an outsized effect on border policy. I don’t think we have had two more
divergent views of the border represented in a presidential election in at least
the past 50 years.
COVID-19 is teaching us many lessons. One is now quite evident: any health
contingency must have truly effective binational responses in a number of
areas including prevention and testing, transportation, humanitarian
assistance, manufacturing, and education. Community responses that were
hatched out of desperation over the last six months could become the
prototypes for a more sophisticated response, once another virus arrives.
Whoever wins or whichever political party gains an edge in the House and
Senate, the border community will have to argue for unprecedented policies
and proposals. Nothing reasonable should be considered out of bounds.
U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and Non-Essential Travel
Restrictions: As a result of a unilateral decision by the U.S. government, CBP
has deliberately reduced its personnel all along the border with Mexico,
increasing wait times at the ports of entry. CBP will reallocate resources to
essential travel peak times.
Wait times on Saturday the 22nd and Sunday the 23rd were between 5 and 10
hours. Ready Lanes at San Ysidro were backed up as far as 5.5 miles. This
represents unprecedented hardship for many thousands of travelers. If the
equivalent were occurring in major U.S. airports, the story would be top
headline news.
Some thoughts about the new restrictions:
The decision is aimed at reducing the further spread of COVID-19. The strategy
is to dissuade U.S. citizens and legal permanent residents from traveling for
non-essential reasons from Mexico to the U.S.
There are two groups of people most affected. First are U.S citizens and legal
residents who go to Mexico for non-essential reasons, e.g., leisure and
recreation. They should not be crossing into Mexico in the first place, but
Mexico has had much looser inspection procedures at its land ports facing the
U.S.
Second, there are many U.S. citizens and legal residents who live on the
Mexican side of the border. Many of them are employed in the U.S. Making it
difficult for them to cross at peak and non-peak hours directly impairs the
economic wellbeing of hundreds of businesses in San Diego.
There are legitimate public health motives for telling U.S. citizens and legal
residents to avoid coming to the U.S.
However, a dose of realism is in order. It is possible the U.S. is applying
tougher restrictions to pressure Mexico to enable more controls on its land
ports to stop U.S. citizens and legal residents from entering Mexico and thus
help prevent the spread of the virus.
It is also possible that the U.S. administration is pursuing electoral ends in
implementing stricter measures at the border. Let’s not forget, however, that
additional restrictions today are not about illegal substances or undocumented
crossers. They are all about authorized travelers, who make up 99.9% of all
crossings into the U.S., and, incidentally, most of these are U.S. citizens or legal
residents.
When one looks at the San Diego-Tijuana region from the mobility and public
health perspective, one must think of contiguous urban areas such as
Minneapolis-St. Paul. People in St. Paul will drive to Minneapolis and vice-versa
to work and other reasons.
Is Minneapolis-St. Paul making it difficult for their residents to travel from one
zip code to another? Is contact tracing used to stop citizens from going from
one place to another?
So much of the federal management we have on both sides of our border is a
result of seeing it in black and white terms from the perspective of the capital
cities, e.g. two countries, two systems, two cultures – there has been little
opportunity to make binational policy in terms of contiguous urban areas
where eligible travelers go about their day as upstanding citizens and where
economic, educational, health, and other aspects drive a complex but effective
working relationship.
The COVID-19 Data Challenge: Navigating Life and Work in Border
Communities. Melissa Floca of the Border Solutions Alliance at the University
of California, San Diego (UCSD) approached me about this special competition
the alliance is organizing with the West Big Data Innovation Hub
(https://westbigdatahub.org/).
The bottom line is about how border communities better understand risk levels
in real-time for different situations and communicate them to the public.
The coordinators state that “Co-creating data-driven solutions – with a focus
on equity and trust-building – will give communities new skills and tools for
problem-solving with limited resources.”
A participant team could build an app or a website, create a dashboard, make a
poster or video that uses data storytelling, or propose a pilot project to gather
new data. For more information please visit:
https://mexico.ucsd.edu/initiatives/border-solutions/data-challenge.html
Border Innovation Challenge, Second Edition: Our coalition has been working
with Monique Casellas of the UCSD Rady School of Management to launch the
Border Innovation Challenge. Competition information will be out on
September 1st
. Our goal this year is to have over 70 participants, double last
year’s participation. Winners will be announced at our grand prize event on
December 1st
.
Border Master Plan Visionary Workshop, Led by Cheryl Mason, SANDAG
Senior Project Manager, Consultants Elizabeth Hannon and IBI Group: I
applaud SANDAG’s initiative to bring together a diverse group of border
stakeholders to develop their wish list of innovative ideas for ports and
surrounding areas.
Participants made over 30 phenomenally energizing proposals. We all had a
chance to pitch our top projects. The Smart Border Coalition’s top five ideas
were (1) key performance indicators for CBP; (2) pre-clearance of passengers
and cargo well ahead of arrival at the ports; (3) a private enterprise “brain
trust” to look at the border as an opportunity for profitable investment; (4) a
practical binational mechanism to prioritize minor yet significant infrastructure
projects; and (5) a governance structure to develop responses for border
needs.
We are expecting the abovementioned consultants to help develop white
papers of the most feasible ideas. More to come…
The South County Economic Development Corporation Binational Committee
continues its good work. Councilmember Barbara Bry, candidate for mayor of
San Diego, was a special guest in the last convening. She believes that the City
of San Diego should have a senior-level director for binational economic
7
development, connecting two disparate worlds: tech in San Diego and Baja
California.
Co-Chair Flavio Olivieri discussed an interactive mapping tool that would let
our community know about the myriad cross-border collaboration efforts in
the fields of health, entrepreneurship, education, tech, civic engagement,
government, manufacturing, and others.
With our day-to-day talk about Tijuana and San Diego, we sometimes overlook
the fact that Ensenada is a major player in the California-Baja California
relationship. Sales among the city’s hospitality, restaurant, and wine industries
have fallen to 70% below last year’s levels. Visits by cruise ships have ceased.
However, activity has been picking up. Most tourists are coming from Mexican
cities; approximately 30% are originating in the U.S. In a normal year, those
percentages are inverted.
Ensenada has been reactivating its economy. One way has been to remove a
highway inspection team that was checking for U.S. citizens not visiting for
essential reasons. The mayor and his economic development team led by
Brenda Mendoza Kawanishi have also been meeting with the state’s
Sustainable Economy and Tourism Secretariat (SEST).
I’ve gotten stakeholder questions about the role of the North American
Development Bank (NADB) in the Tijuana River Valley issue. The NADB has
participated as funds administrator for the Border Environment Infrastructure
Fund (BEIF) which is part of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). This
has come in handy especially with disbursements to water agencies in Mexico.
BEIF funds have been meager over the last 5 years. They are only $25 million
this year, and only about 40% come to the California and Arizona
border. Mexico must match these funds 1-to-1. Some of these funds have been
7
used to improve Tijuana’s east and west sewage collectors, but this is very
piecemeal given the sheer size of the problem.
There are two areas where new, non-BEIF EPA funds totaling $300 million will
almost surely be applied to solve the Tijuana sewage issue and where NADB
could play a role: Tijuana River contaminated water that crosses into the U.S.
and the treatment plant rehabilitation in Tijuana.
The question remains whether EPA funds can actually be invested on the
Mexican side of the border. If some of this money is allowed in Mexico, NADB
will most likely manage it.
NADB has always been involved in technical and policy groups organized by the
EPA but has not been given any decision making power. The best they can do
is lobby for a particular outcome.
I was astonished to hear the story of Estudios Baja/Baja Studios last week in
the words of Don José Galicot, producers Rolando Navarro and Luisa Gomez
de Silva. The studios are still a hidden gem. Don José opened the presentation
with the comment about the symbiosis between Rosarito and the studios and
how they activate the small city’s economy and excite so many.
Baja Studios was built in 1996 by 20th Century Fox and is known for Titanic, but
there have been plenty of top box office hits such as Pearl Harbor, Point Break
2, Little Boy, Fear the Walking Dead, The Rescue (Chinese), Señora Acero
(Telemundo) and others produced there. The set has four enormous tanks to
simulate sea scenes and shoot underwater scenes. The largest tank holds 17
million gallons!
AI Mexico is one of those diamonds in the rough we need to engage with
(aimexico.org). It promotes “artificial intelligence (AI) education and its
responsible adoption by industry to create competitive businesses that
ultimately benefit our communities.” It started in Ensenada, the city with the
highest number of scientists per capita in Latin America.
I spoke with Director Adrian Munguia, former SAIC and ABB employee and
Universidad Autonoma de Baja California (UABC) graduate, who started the
organization with a handful of AI professionals and now employing over 600.
He is also creating a cross-border AI innovation community. Microsoft and the
Canadian government have established ties with AI Mexico to develop a strong
capability of experts for cutting-edge projects in North America.
Thank you all for your generous support for the Smart Border Coalition. We
hope to see you at our next webinar on September 10, from 9 to 11 a.m..
Please register here:
us02web.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_uVnhTgEbSeGLn2qc6YImwQ
After registering, you will receive a confirmation email containing information
about joining the webinar.
I leave you with a link to the recently done, lively welcome video for our
coalition. I think it reflects effectively the spirit we strive to promote. I hope
you like it: youtube.com/watch?v=xRuQTMSaO6U
With best wishes,
Gustavo De La Fuente
Executive Director
gdelafuente@smartbordercoalition.com
(619) 814-1386
gdelafuente@smartbordercoalition.com
(619) 814-1386